StackDrift

End of life / Alternatives / eol.watch

StackDrift vs eol.watch

eol.watch takes the stack you subscribe and alerts you on a schedule that starts a year out. Both of these answer the same problem, which is software on your machines going out of support. The difference worth choosing on is where the list of what you run comes from. eol.watch works from a list you enter and keep current by hand. StackDrift has a command line tool that discovers what is actually installed on the machine.

What eol.watch does well

Where StackDrift differs

What each one costs

eol.watch
Freemium, so there is a free tier to start on.
StackDrift
No free tier. A 14 day trial, and it takes a card.

Worth being straight about that trade, because it is the first thing anyone checks. Several of the products these pages compare us with are free or have a free tier, and StackDrift has neither. If a date and a reminder is all you need, you can have both for nothing, and this page is not going to pretend otherwise.

Which one you want

A subscription list you keep by hand is exactly right while the list is short and you know what is on it. StackDrift is the answer once nobody is certain what is installed on the servers any more.

The other comparisons

Every claim about eol.watch on this page was read off their own site on 21 September 2026. Products change, so check theirs before you decide.

The part a comparison table cannot answer for you

Every product on this page, StackDrift included, is only ever as right as the list of what you run. StackDrift scans your machines and works that list out for you, across every runtime, operating system and kernel underneath your code, then mails you before the next support window closes or a CVE lands on a build you have deployed.

Start a 14 day free trial

A card is needed to open the trial and nothing is charged until it ends.